ADCC 440/2008
Background
Two claimants filed a case against a defendant claiming they owned an agricultural materials company and veterinary clinic and the defendant was responsible for undertaking financial and administrative tasks but had failed to do his job efficiently. The claimants requested the court order the defendant to pay 382100 AED.
The court rejected the case because the claimants had not provided any evidence to prove their claim.
The claimants appealed the ruling before the court of appeal. The court of appeal upheld the ruling.
Decision
The claimant appealed the ruling before the court of cassation and stated in their grounds of appeal that the ruling had erred in the application of law because the court had rejected their request to order the defendant to swear.